I ask CEOs this question all the time.
“How did annual planning go?”
“Great. Two full days. Leadership team was there. Great conversations. Everyone left energized.”
Then I ask the question that matters:
So, what changed?
That's usually where the pause comes.
The real purpose of an annual planning agenda is to turn strategy into clear priorities, ownership, and a 90-day execution plan. It's not about filling two days with good conversation.
I've made this mistake myself. We had a great planning session, made big decisions, and left energized, but energy isn't execution. If nothing changes, you didn't finish planning.
The majority of annual planning sessions aren't bad; they're just designed around the wrong outcome.
Look at a typical agenda:
Nothing wrong with those topics, but what is the team supposed to produce? That's the question most agendas don't answer.
A good discussion about market opportunities doesn't automatically become a priority. A priority doesn't automatically get an owner, and an owner doesn't automatically know what needs to happen in the next 90 days. You have to design those transitions.
I've spent years helping leadership teams close the gap between strategy and execution, and I've learned that execution can't be something you bolt onto the last hour of annual planning.
Execution has to be designed into the agenda from the beginning.
Over the years, we've refined annual planning into five deliberate moves. The order matters.
This is exactly the structure behind our own Annual Planning process, and it's why we built a free Annual Planning Agenda and a full Annual Planning Toolkit — templates, checklists, and facilitation guides — so you're not reinventing this from a blank page every January.
Here's something I've noticed after coaching hundreds of CEOs through annual planning: the teams that skip or rush the core values conversation are almost always the same teams that end up debating priorities in circles for hours. Why? Because core values are the decision filter for everything that comes after them on the agenda.
At Rhythm Systems, one of our core values is No TDC — no Thinly Disguised Contempt. It means we resolve disagreements instead of letting them fester into quiet resentment. When that value is alive in the room, a hard debate about which three priorities make the final cut stays healthy and honest instead of turning into politics. Another one of ours, Go the 2nd Mile, shapes how we talk about ownership — we don't just ask "who's responsible for this," we ask "who's going to anticipate what this priority really needs to succeed?"
You don't need our specific values — you need your values, genuinely revisited, sitting at the top of the agenda before a single priority gets debated. Be curious about whether your team still lives them. Ask directly: does this priority reflect who we say we are? An agenda that treats core values as a five-minute icebreaker instead of a real checkpoint is quietly setting itself up to produce priorities nobody feels ownership over.
This is exactly the distinction Cathy McCullough drills into every leadership team she works with, and it's a centerpiece of her Annual Planning Masterclass: a great annual planning agenda has to end in commitment, not just decision. Take a look at the clip below.
That distinction matters more than most leaders realize. Deciding on a priority is easy; you can decide on five priorities in an afternoon. Committing to one, naming an owner, defining what green, yellow, and red look like, and putting it on next quarter's calendar is where most agendas quietly fall apart.
Our Think Plan Do® methodology exists precisely to close that gap. The "Plan" isn't the finish line; it's the handoff into "Do." If your annual planning agenda doesn't end with a clear bridge into your first quarterly planning session, you haven't finished the job; you've just had a good conversation.
Before your next planning session, ask your leadership team one question: Does our agenda produce conversations, or does it produce commitments?
That one question will tell you almost everything about whether next year's plan has a real chance of becoming next year's results. I've watched teams transform their entire trajectory simply by redesigning how they spend those two days together, not working harder in the room, but working with more intention about what the room is actually supposed to produce.
Explore the full Annual Planning Toolkit to bring this structure into your own planning session. We’ve built the templates and tools our coaches use with growth companies so you can bring the same structure into your own planning session.
Here's to a year you actually execute, not just plan.